Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
glasgowken wrote:Apologies if this should be in the help thread, but it's not really asking for assistance, more about opinions.
Just wondering if it's all about megapixels these days. There are loads of really cheap, no name brand, cameras around with 6 and 7 MP. But it it can't be that simple otherwise everyone would be buying them above the big name stuff.
So why did you buy your camera ? Was it price, spec, brand loyality ?
And given a choice, do you feel that a big name camera with lower MP is better than one of the no name jobs with higher MPs.
glasgowken wrote:Good price that.
I bought a couple of second hand cameras, a Nikon, and a Prackica, so i'm ok for a wee while, but I was just curious.
glasgowken wrote:Coolpix 3200. Oldie, but good reviews and it was dirt cheap. I've develped a real adversion to buying anything I care about dropping, losing, or getting stolen. The Prackica was even cheaper, so I'm keeping that on me whenever i'm oot.
I'd still be interested to hear if anyone has bought one of the really cheap cameras. How did it turn out ?
glasgowken wrote:A very worthy cause, good luck with the choice![]()
I've just bought another second hand camera, got three now. Don't really know why I need three, but it looked good
Flash_Andy wrote:… Bus & Coach preservation magazine, but they said 6million megapixels is ideal for publication?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests