Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
Mori wrote:BBC
Sales fall for most Sunday papers
And sales of the Sunday Post dropped below 200,000 for the first time in decades.
Scotland will be free, said the historian Tom Nairn, when the last minister is strangled by the last copy of the Sunday Post
RDR wrote:Two issues for me.
1. I think the print media as we knew it is dead. I rarely buy a newspaper anymore and read them all on line. Except for the more highly specalised magazines, then I cannot see hardcopy newspapers unless of the 'free' variety continuing.
2. Press standards are awful particularly amongst the tabloid press (though the Hearld isn't much better). Its not all about phone and e-mail hacking either. The general standard of reporting is simply awful. Who knows what is taught on university and college 'journalisim and media studies) courses, but it doesn't seem to include checking and getting your facts straight, morals and ethics and fabrication. I'm speaking from the experience of having to deal with the press from time to time.
What happened to the great investigative journalists like Pilger and Foot?
The Egg Man wrote:RDR wrote:Two issues for me.
1. I think the print media as we knew it is dead. I rarely buy a newspaper anymore and read them all on line. Except for the more highly specalised magazines, then I cannot see hardcopy newspapers unless of the 'free' variety continuing.
2. Press standards are awful particularly amongst the tabloid press (though the Hearld isn't much better). Its not all about phone and e-mail hacking either. The general standard of reporting is simply awful. Who knows what is taught on university and college 'journalisim and media studies) courses, but it doesn't seem to include checking and getting your facts straight, morals and ethics and fabrication. I'm speaking from the experience of having to deal with the press from time to time.
What happened to the great investigative journalists like Pilger and Foot?
Do you mean guys who could punctuate and spell?
The editor-in-chief of the Scotsman has become the latest victim of a brutal cull of senior editorial executives by Ashley Highfield at regional newspaper publisher Johnston Press.
John McLellan's editor-in-chief role at Scotsman Publications is being axed as part of a cost-cutting management restructure, the Scotsman's Edinburgh-based journalists were told in an internal announcement on Thursday lunchtime by Johnston Press Scotland managing director Andrew Richardson.
This comes after Highfield, who took over as chief executive from John Fry late last year, stunned Johnston Press journalists on Wednesday by axing the editors of daily regional titles the Yorkshire Post, Yorkshire Evening Post and the Lancashire Evening Post.
McLellan, who is understood to have been escorted from the Scotsman building around midday, was appointed as editor-in-chief of the Scotsman, Scotland on Sunday and the Edinburgh Evening News in 2009.
RDR wrote: ...................
No, I mean reporters who want to get at the truth, not bend a story to suit their own ends.
Or those who might care about the effects the stories they publish have on individuals.
The Egg Man wrote:RDR wrote: ...................
No, I mean reporters who want to get at the truth, not bend a story to suit their own ends.
Or those who might care about the effects the stories they publish have on individuals.
Isn't that a bit selective? You want the truth but only if it doesn't have an effect on individuals.
The Egg Man wrote:RDR wrote: ...................
No, I mean reporters who want to get at the truth, not bend a story to suit their own ends.
Or those who might care about the effects the stories they publish have on individuals.
Isn't that a bit selective? You want the truth but only if it doesn't have an effect on individuals.
strange brew wrote:But Vince Cable has no responsibility at all towards the deal - that was taken away from him after he was caught on tape admirably declaring war on Murdoch. Shouldn't you be targeting Jeremy Cu..sorry, Hunt, who actually will be the deciding factor here?
The Egg Man wrote:All the press are interested in is circulation (and advertising). Joan McAlpine is a bit controversial - she's the wumman who insists that anyone not pro-independence is anti-Scottish.
It rather poses the question, how many Record readers read McAlpine's column? How many Evening Times readers read Anas Sarwar's column. How many readers know either column exists. I know it's not a fair comparison but when you look at the 'most read' section of the online version of the two papers it's almost 100% stories about Rangers situation.
Dexter St. Clair wrote:Cyber Nats on retreat underneath the article.
Although I did like the reference to Frank McAveety preferring a more proletarian lunch and Rosie Kane insisting she sat with the proletarians in the canteen.
Return to Glasgow Chat (Coffee Lounge)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests