The Hidden Glasgow Forums

by **KonstantinL** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:14 am

Wasn't it a guy called Stephen Clarkson that actually decked the attacker.

You ask me this Smeeton character is getting too much of the credit.

WHIT'S THE SCORE?

by **scallopboy** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:04 am

KonstantinL wrote:Wasn't it a guy called Stephen Clarkson that actually decked the attacker.

You ask me this Smeeton character is getting too much of the credit.

WHIT'S THE SCORE?

You dissin' the Smeatonator?

It's a bit of fun in an otherwise rather depressing situation. I hope when the 1000 pint mark has been reached that any staff at the airport whether involved or not, police and passengers come along to the Holiday Inn and get a pint. I think the fact that he was just himself on camera makes him endearing to lots of people.

by **james73** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:22 am

James H

by **glasgowken** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:22 am

KonstantinL wrote:Wasn't it a guy called Stephen Clarkson that actually decked the attacker.

You ask me this Smeeton character is getting too much of the credit.

WHIT'S THE SCORE?

Nooo, don't spoil it ::):

JS is the man.

by **John** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:46 am

At last some sensible words on the matter.

http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/02/t ... _outbreak/

by **hazy** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:03 pm

JohnR wrote:At last some sensible words on the matter.

http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/02/t ... _outbreak/

JohnR how the fuck can you read that and state "sensible words". These pricks have caused utter mayhem all over the UK and by the sounds of it Australia was next. There incompetence in not succeeding to blow innocent people to Kingdom come is neither here nor there. They set out to cause damage and in one way or another they succeeded . If the had succeeded in carrying out the desired full effect I am sure all the loonies would have been shouting from the top of there illegal mosques, thankfully the never did and all the loonies that helped them are denying they had anything to do with this so called splinter group.
The prick that wrote the paper obviously is in no way affected by this act of terrorism.

by **red_kola** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:12 pm

hazy wrote:JohnR how the fuck can you read that and state "sensible words". These pricks have caused utter mayhem all over the UK

Yeah yeah yeah. We are at war with Eurasia. We have always been at war with Eurasia...

by **Verbal Kint** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:03 pm

John Smeaton is to be onstage at T in the Park possibly

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/gla ... 264608.stm

by **John** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:33 pm

hazy wrote:
JohnR wrote:At last some sensible words on the matter.

http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/02/t ... _outbreak/

JohnR how the fuck can you read that and state "sensible words". These pricks have caused utter mayhem all over the UK and by the sounds of it Australia was next. There incompetence in not succeeding to blow innocent people to Kingdom come is neither here nor there. They set out to cause damage and in one way or another they succeeded . If the had succeeded in carrying out the desired full effect I am sure all the loonies would have been shouting from the top of there illegal mosques, thankfully the never did and all the loonies that helped them are denying they had anything to do with this so called splinter group.
The prick that wrote the paper obviously is in no way affected by this act of terrorism.

Blimey have you been taking your angry pills? And please don't swear at me! The point of the article was to point out that this has to be put in some sort of perspective.

The article was written by a former armed forces UK bomb disposal expert so I will give his words more credibility than yours.

You have gone off on several tangents in your reply which have nothing to do with the content of the article so don't have a go at me about something I wasn't actually saying.

Ok that's the meaningful content over you can all get back to John Smeaton trivia.

by **potatojunkie** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 2:39 pm

JohnR wrote:At last some sensible words on the matter.

The Register wrote:The Register is dead brilliant.

It's a shame they always come across as so deeply in love with themselves, because the article's pretty much bang on.

hazy wrote:These pricks have caused utter mayhem all over the UK

No, no they really haven't. And not just because that isn't what "mayhem" means.

by **Ally Doll** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:00 pm

JohnR wrote:At last some sensible words on the matter.

http://www.theregister.com/2007/07/02/t ... _outbreak/

I prefer the Daily Mash take on things... :wink:

by **John** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:22 pm

Excellent website Ally I don't know why I haven't seen it before.

Ta.

by **Ally Doll** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:27 pm

JohnR wrote:Excellent website Ally I don't know why I haven't seen it before.

Ta.

Hope it's helped alleviate your boredom!

by **John** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:43 pm

Thanks it did Ally. I am working on something very tedious at the moment which is taking up too much of my time plus I haven't been out to take any pictures in over 2 months now.

by **Doorstop** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 6:28 pm

How about this for a step for a hint Mr. Terrorist?

Advice for Jihadists

Starts off slowly but give it a chance. :wink:

The Hidden Glasgow Forums

Glasgow Airport Terror Alert

Who is online