Help save the Govanhill Picture House!

Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza

Help save the Govanhill Picture House!

Postby gap74 » Wed Aug 31, 2005 1:21 am

The planning application ad in Friday's Evening Times contained an application to demolish the former Govanhill Picture House at 47-49 Bankhall St, Govanhill.

Opened in 1926, the building was the work of architect Eric A Sutherland, who produced many commercial buildings in the west of Scotland between around 1910-1940. His work included churches, warehouses and a number of banks, but perhaps his best known work is was the British Ropes office block at Farme Cross, near Rutherglen, sadly lost to neglect and vandalism a few years ago.

He also designed a number of cinemas, his better known examples being the long-demolished Mayfair in Sinclair Drive on the southside, and the Govanhill under threat here.

The Govanhill Picture House was taken over by ABC cinemas a few years after opening, and closed as a cinema in 1961, becoming a bingo hall until 1974. More recently, it had been used for warehousing, and has lain derelict for the past couple of years.

Although we believe the interior to have been largely lost, the building has a highly unusual Egyptian style tiled entrance, with columns flanking the doorway and two domed turrets to either side. A moulded scarab crowns the original name sign, still just visible under modern signage.

The rarity of this exterior led to the building being B-listed in 1989, and it has since gained the dubious honour of being included on the Buildings at Risk Register. The application proposes total demolition, to be replaced by 48 flats of quite hideous uniformity and blandness.

I looked over the application this afternoon, bearing in mind that demolition of a listed building can only be considered against tests of importance, condition and alternative uses. No evidence whatsoever was present in the folder with regards to any of the above. Although deteriorating, the main facade looks to be in reasonable condition, and there are no signs that the building is for sale or being considered for alternative uses.

So, what we would like is for this application to be rejected, and here's where we hope we can get a few people here to assist us!

If anyone can spare the time, it would be much appreciated if you could drop an email or letter of objection to the council, making it known that you object to the demolition of this listed building. The application number to quote is 05/02663/DC, and the closing date is 16th Sept. Emails can be sent to planning.representations@drs.glasgow.gov.uk, or you can post to:

Development and Regeneration Services
Development Control
229 George Street
Glasgow
G1 1QU

I'll post a few pics here, more details are, of course, available on our website at:

http://www.chem.gla.ac.uk/~gbarr/cinema ... nhill.html

Image

Image

Cheers,
Gary
User avatar
gap74
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1531
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:33 am

Postby Apollo » Wed Aug 31, 2005 2:39 pm

Well, they'll get at least one objection :wink:

Was friendly with a guy that ran a wee specialist service for cars nearby many years ago, so often found myself there with an hour or two to kill if he wanted peace. I remember wandering around the area looking for anything interesting and being stunned to walk around the corner one bright sunny morning to find this brilliant white temple before me.

It's really sad that while some fight to retain features such as this, built years ago, looking at most of the stuff going up today, its hard to find something similarly interesting that our descendants will be equally motivated to put up the same sort of fight for.
User avatar
Apollo
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 2284
Joined: Sun May 09, 2004 10:26 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby Fat Cat » Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:10 pm

Who are they building all these flats for?
User avatar
Fat Cat
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 835
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 3:09 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby smartie » Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:33 pm

Surley they could keep the facade as a beautiful entrance......
User avatar
smartie
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: Glesga Soo Side

Postby Bruce » Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:41 pm

Considering the dubious precedents set by the redevelopment of the Ascot and the Tolledo - it see bizarre that they are going for total demolition. On face value it looks as if it would be relatively easy to incorporate the entrance archway & flanking turrets.

I shall make sure that the AHSS are aware of this & encourage them to make an objection.
... they’re all made out of ticky tacky, and they all look just the same.
Bruce
First Stripe
First Stripe
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:37 pm
Location: The Land of Shaws.

Postby ladylabobo » Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:39 pm

I live not too far away from there and I didnt even know that existed. Shall draft up a letter tonight!
User avatar
ladylabobo
Second Stripe
Second Stripe
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: sooside

Postby nodrog » Tue Sep 06, 2005 11:24 am

Thanks to everyone that's taking the time to object. Got mine in the post today...

Dear Sir/Madam,

Objection to Planning Application Reference 05/02663/DC
(former Govanhill Picture House, Bankhall Street, Glasgow)

I am writing to lodge an official objection in the strongest possible terms to the above noted planning applications.

The plans involve the complete demolition of the cinema building to be replaced by flats.

The building was listed Grade B by Historic Scotland in 1989, primarily for its unusual Egyptian-styled facade.

The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997 states, in part:
"…a planning authority […] shall have special regard to the desirability of preserving the building or its setting or any features of special architectural or historic interest which it possesses."

"… "preserving", in relation to a building, means preserving it either in its existing state or subject only to such alterations or extensions as can be carried out without serious detriment to its character, and "development" includes redevelopment."


I would therefore strongly suggest that the current application would NOT preserve the features of architectural interest, and would cause VERY serious detriment to the character of the listed building, given it involves its total demolition.

The National Planning Policy Guidelines state, in part:

“With respect to the demolition (meaning total or substantial destruction) of listed buildings, it is Government policy that no such building should be lost to our environment unless it is demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that every effort has been exerted by all concerned to find practical ways of keeping them.”


Given that this planning application involves the total demolition of the building, the onus is on the developers to prove that every effort has been exerted to find a practical way to keep the building intact.

Inspection of the publicly available documents included with the application in August 2005 show no supporting evidence from the developers that any effort has been made to market the building or attempt to find an alternative use for it in its present form.

The Historic Scotland Memorandum of Guidance on listed buildings and conservation areas (1998) states in part that:

“[…]authorities are urged, in considering applications for consent to demolish, to
presume in favour of the preservation of listed buildings except where a strong case can be made out for demolition after full consideration of the following factors: …
[…]a building’s importance both in itself and in its contribution to the local scene,
[…]a building’s condition, the cost of repairing and maintaining it in relation to its importance
[…]it will be necessary to show beyond doubt that it is not possible to adapt the existing building to accommodate any new use, or mix of uses, which would safeguard its future”


No documentation has been provided at the time of publicising this planning application to suggest that any of the three tests (importance, condition and alternative uses) have been applied to this building.

No suggestion has been made that the building is not of importance architecturally.

No survey has been provided showing the fabric of the building is in any way dangerous or beyond repair.

No information has been provided showing that no alternative use for the building in its current state can be found.


Therefore in every possible way this application fails to provide any reasonable justification for demolition, and should be clearly and strongly refused. Any other outcome would simply make a complete mockery of our planning and listed building system.
"I'd just move on to the 'hot-air ballooning vigilante' stage of my career earlier than planned"

www.scottishcinemas.org.uk
www.twitter.com/scottishcinemas
User avatar
nodrog
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby johnnyanglia » Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:14 pm

Nice one Nodrog, My objection to the proposal will be in the post tomorrow :D
johnnyanglia
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:29 am

Postby DickyHart » Thu Sep 08, 2005 12:55 am

Posted one off today. I hope that helps.
User avatar
DickyHart
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1503
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:30 pm
Location: Rutherglen

Postby Fossil » Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:14 am

....sent

Fosil
Bum tit tit bum tit tit play yer hairy banjo
User avatar
Fossil
-
-
 
Posts: 12295
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Pitt Street

Postby JayKay » Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:25 am

Thanks Nodrog, will get this writ and posted
User avatar
JayKay
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 4:29 pm

Postby JayKay » Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:01 am

Been activating some of my meeja contacts regarding this story. Could be some developments in terms of publicising the story.
User avatar
JayKay
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 4:29 pm

Postby nodrog » Tue Sep 13, 2005 9:03 am

Good stuff JayKay - we tried prodding the Evening Times about it, but with no result so far.
"I'd just move on to the 'hot-air ballooning vigilante' stage of my career earlier than planned"

www.scottishcinemas.org.uk
www.twitter.com/scottishcinemas
User avatar
nodrog
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby nodrog » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:05 pm

Update on the Govanhill - everyone's objection letters last year clearly made a difference, as the council requested they incorporate the facade in the rebuild. There are now updated plans available (05/02663/DC and 05/01050/DC) to view at GCC.

We are still objecting to the new plans on the grounds that the new build will dwarf the small retained portion of the facade, and also ...

Policy HER 2 of the Glasgow City Plan states, in part, for listed buildings:
Arguments [for demolition] based on economic obsolescence and/or structural decay must be accompanied by written evidence which proves the case to the satisfaction of the Council and the relevant Scottish Ministers. This will usually entail the submission of studies by property and/or engineering consultants.


There is *still* no written supporting evidence of any kind to show that this has been done.

For this reason we're suggesting that the application should in fact be considered invalid until such written evidence is forthcoming and available for consultation.

In addition, it was interesting reading through the other objections in the case file in that that at least one organisation had attempted to enter discussions with a view to buying the building, and utilising it in its current form. It would therefore seem that alternative uses are indeed still a potentially viable option...

If anyone wanted to make comments on the revised plans, the next week or so would be an excellent time to do so...

Nodrog

Here's whats being proposed currently (apologies for the crappy quality of the shots!):

Image


Image
"I'd just move on to the 'hot-air ballooning vigilante' stage of my career earlier than planned"

www.scottishcinemas.org.uk
www.twitter.com/scottishcinemas
User avatar
nodrog
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Glasgow

Postby johnnyanglia » Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:05 am

I will be sending in an objection too.
johnnyanglia
Third Stripe
Third Stripe
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 12:29 am

Next

Return to Glasgow Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron