Moderators: John, Sharon, Fossil, Lucky Poet, crusty_bint, Jazza, dazza
HollowHorn wrote:It's not just that they will not admit that they got it wrong, they will not even give the large lawful protest any credence in changing their decision. They are now actually blaming the protesters. Apparently the demolition cannot go ahead because of fears that the protesters could pose a threat to security & safety at the site.
pingu wrote:re red road
our local mp is as useful as ever
http://www.williebain.com/2014/featured ... -ceremony/
moonbeam wrote:The demolition guys are at the Lincoln Avenue flats. They are just "setting up".
Celyn wrote:He seems to be someone who places too much faith in his spelling checker. ::): Or, given that he doesn't seem to like apostrophes and does seem to like Amercanised spelling, perhaps he's just silly. Come to think of it, isn't he a lawyer by profession? If so, he shows a worrying lack of attention to detail, but I might have remembered the "lawyer" bit wrongly.
Josef wrote:Just from curiosity, you understand : is anyone prepared to explain to me why high-rise social housing = Bad, bad veeery bad, whilst high-rise private housing = good, good, the way forward?
Josef wrote:Just from curiosity, you understand : is anyone prepared to explain to me why high-rise social housing = Bad, bad veeery bad, whilst high-rise private housing = good, good, the way forward?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests